{"id":20381,"date":"2021-11-11T01:28:36","date_gmt":"2021-11-11T06:28:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/?p=20381"},"modified":"2021-11-03T15:03:31","modified_gmt":"2021-11-03T19:03:31","slug":"halting-plagiarism-before-it-starts-teaching-strategies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/2021\/11\/11\/halting-plagiarism-before-it-starts-teaching-strategies\/","title":{"rendered":"Halting Plagiarism before it Starts: Teaching Strategies"},"content":{"rendered":"

In a previous blog post, I made a brief case for not using plagiarism detection software<\/a>. I also argued that we could partially resolve some of our concerns about plagiarism by designing writing assignments that offer authentic writing challenges related to our fields of study.<\/p>\n

In this blog, I want to go one step further and suggest that we can design writing assignments and processes that privilege student learning first, with the happy side-effect of also preventing plagiarism! We can even do so in ways that meaningfully integrate writing into your current courses without significant displacement of other content, or without over-taxing your already over-taxed time and energy.<\/p>\n

Design a Process that is Hard to Fake<\/strong><\/p>\n

Copy and pasting from Google or an article isn\u2019t the real plagiarism problem we face. The real issue is the essay mill industry that is churning out essays for students to purchase and pass off as their own (something plagiarism detection software can\u2019t help us with, by the way). That industry flourishes because finalized writing is easy to fake.<\/p>\n

The more generic or stock the assignment, the easier it is to fake. Likewise, the less involved the composing process is, the easier the final draft is to fake. It is difficult to reverse-engineer a purchased essay so that it looks like it went through a specific series of revisions. For instance, you can make the \u201cLiterature Review\u201d and the \u201cDiscussion\u201d section of a report due as separate assignments; you could have the \u201cMethodology\u201d section be composed alongside a series of focused activities. You can even set the expectation that students do revisions between those drafts and the final and write a reflection explaining how and why the text has changed as they worked on it.<\/p>\n

A process-based approach also opens the opportunity to address accidental plagiarism as a moment of learning. If I see a student has dropped in a quote without attribution and we are still at the rough draft stage, it is a good point to explain both the ethics and the written conventions of attribution.<\/p>\n

What if I Don\u2019t Have Time to \u201cTeach Writing\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n

One counterpoint I have particular sympathy for is \u201cI don\u2019t have time or space in my curriculum to teach writing.\u201d I get it. As a writing teacher, I know how labor-intensive a process-based pedagogy can be. Time and labor are precious resources to academics of all ranks.<\/p>\n

However, keep in mind that teaching writing is teaching how to think in your field. It works best alongside <\/em>the intellectual process of engaging work in your field, not as a final product<\/em> at the end. If you are teaching students how to take fields notes to integrate into a larger research project, you are teaching writing. If you\u2019re teaching students how to analyze the sections of a lab report, you are teaching writing.<\/p>\n

Additionally, consider the following time-saving teaching practices:<\/p>\n

Rubrics as Reflection Tools:<\/em>
\n<\/strong>Teachers often present rubrics to students as assessment tools\u2014”these are the criteria by which you will be judged.\u201d Personally, I love rubrics and find them invaluable to teaching writing. But we miss a real opportunity when students only see them as the medium through which a grade arrives in their inbox.<\/p>\n

A good rubric is primarily a reflection tool<\/em>. Alternately, a bad rubric assigns points only <\/em>to formal characteristics of the text–commas, paragraph length, thesis statement, citations, etc.\u2014 that don\u2019t help writers learn how to write.<\/p>\n

Instead, you can design your rubrics to name the several rhetorical goals<\/em> or written conventions <\/em>of a text\u2014synthesizing research, integrating evidence, analyzing data, considering audience expectations, etc. Then the evaluative criteria in your rubric become points of reflection<\/em> as students compose. Midway through a process, you can ask students to use a well-designed rubric to self-assess their own writing and identify specific places for revision.<\/p>\n

You can also design short in-class or online modules around those specific elements of the rubric. We can even assign reflective writing, in advance of a deadline, that asks students to use our rubrics to self-assess a draft and locate specific areas for revision.<\/p>\n

Peer Review<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Sometimes the best advice comes from others doing similar work. Though detailed written or recorded feedback on student writing is of inestimable value to student writers, there are ways to center lessons on written conventions specific to your field.<\/p>\n

One thing you might do is a model in class and discuss some of the written conventions the model is doing well; then have students work in groups to offer feedback on the use of those conventions. For instance, if there are specific conventions for writing methodology sections in your field, you can (a) assign a draft of just that session to be due on a certain date; (b) in class, point out some of the rhetorical purposes of that section that are specific to your field; (c) outline some of those conventions together; (d) briefly discuss why those conventions exist, and then (e) ask students to read each other\u2019s drafts and give feedback along those lines.<\/p>\n

Design Mini-Lessons on Writing<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

You don\u2019t have to set aside entire class meetings to teach writing effectively.<\/p>\n

When I am reading drafts of student writing, I often notice that multiple people are making the same missteps. In those cases, I stop commenting on it. You can really exhaust yourself by trying to give everyone the same feedback (or by playing copyeditor instead of guide).<\/p>\n

In those cases, I tell myself: \u201cThat\u2019s a lesson.\u201d If you notice that a majority of students are placing a period in the wrong place in APA citations, then take 5 minutes to point it out, have them open their drafts, and look for the issue; if you notice that many students are engaging audiences in ways that would be considered unprofessional by peers in your field, design a short activity to model why that convention exists, what it looks like, then have them open their drafts (or even share drafts with each other) to look for it.<\/p>\n

If you feel like your in-class time is so jam-packed you can\u2019t set aside a few moments to discuss writing, then also consider designing online modules that ask students to complete distinct process steps related to the revisions you would like to see in their writing. For instance, consider creating a homework module with a short video explaining the rhetorical goals of the section that needs work, design one or two process activities that ask students to complete distinct process steps related to the revisions you would like to see, and even require a short reflection so that you can respond to questions or confusions (especially if you don\u2019t have the capacity to respond to each draft individually).<\/p>\n

Further Reading:<\/p>\n

Anti-Plagiarism Strategies for Research Papers (2020) Rober Harris, VirtualSalt – http:\/\/www.virtualsalt.com\/anti-plagiarism-strategies-for-research-papers\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Rubrics (nd.) Berkeley Center for Teaching & Learning – https:\/\/teaching.berkeley.edu\/resources\/improve\/evaluate-course-level-learning\/rubrics<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a previous blog post, I made a brief case for not using plagiarism detection software. I also argued that we could partially resolve some of our concerns about plagiarism […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3264,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"off","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[57,168,436],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog","category-student-engagement","category-teaching-and-learning"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":20384,"url":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/2021\/11\/09\/plagiarism-as-pedagogical-question\/","url_meta":{"origin":20381,"position":0},"title":"Plagiarism as Pedagogical Question","author":"Jonathan Bradshaw","date":"November 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Think back to a piece of writing you produced that makes you proud. It could be an academic article, a grant proposal, a job application. I imagine it makes you proud because it was an experience that involved hard, engaged work. I bet it also gives you a strong sense\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Blog"","block_context":{"text":"Blog","link":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/category\/blog\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":24154,"url":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/2026\/01\/07\/things-instructors-should-know-about-the-walcs-ai-policy\/","url_meta":{"origin":20381,"position":1},"title":"Things instructors should know about the WaLC\u2019s AI policy","author":"Anabel Livengood","date":"January 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"If you\u00a0teach at\u00a0Western, you might be wondering how\u00a0peer educators\u00a0at the\u00a0WaLC\u00a0(Writing\u00a0and Learning Commons)\u00a0navigate conversations around AI with students seeking support.\u00a0The\u00a0WaLC\u00a0team\u00a0would like instructors to know that an\u00a0internal\u00a0AI policy\u00a0exists,\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0it was developed to\u00a0be as\u00a0faculty forward\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Academic Integrity"","block_context":{"text":"Academic Integrity","link":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/category\/academic-integrity\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20912,"url":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/2022\/12\/31\/chatgpt-using-chatbots-in-higher-education\/","url_meta":{"origin":20381,"position":2},"title":"ChatGPT: Using Chatbots in Higher Education","author":"Ian Selig","date":"December 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"","rel":"","context":"In "Blog"","block_context":{"text":"Blog","link":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/category\/blog\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/87\/2022\/12\/milad-fakurian-58Z17lnVS4U-unsplash-300x228.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":24077,"url":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/2026\/01\/09\/academic-integrity-at-wcu\/","url_meta":{"origin":20381,"position":3},"title":"Academic Integrity at WCU: Key Insights from a Fall 2025 Student Survey","author":"Anabel Livengood","date":"January 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"","rel":"","context":"In "Academic Integrity"","block_context":{"text":"Academic Integrity","link":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/category\/academic-integrity\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":24366,"url":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/2026\/01\/30\/student-feedback-on-impactful-learning\/","url_meta":{"origin":20381,"position":4},"title":"Student Feedback on Impactful Learning","author":"Anabel Livengood","date":"January 30, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"","rel":"","context":"In "Assessment"","block_context":{"text":"Assessment","link":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/category\/assessment\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2790,"url":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/2017\/01\/09\/alternative-assignments-for-snow-days\/","url_meta":{"origin":20381,"position":5},"title":"Alternative assignments for Snow Days","author":"wcuadmin","date":"January 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDon\u2019t let a snow day catch you off guard!\u201d \u201cI\u2019ve had to revise my syllabus twice, changing the schedule, and as a result, changing the weight of the first two exams\u2026it\u2019s an unfortunate start\u2026not something that cannot be overcome.\u201d \u2013 Professor Brian Pilecki Technology-based assignment alternatives: Lecture \/ Discussion Record\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Blog"","block_context":{"text":"Blog","link":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/blog\/category\/blog\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3264"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20381"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20416,"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20381\/revisions\/20416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/affiliate.wcu.edu\/cfc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}