Student Feedback on Impactful Learning

During the 2025 Fall semester, the CFC conducted a project to understand what types of assignments students find the most impactful. We asked students, “What is an assignment that has really helped you learn?” Through hosting a table event, collecting responses through a survey, and gathering video interviews, we have received feedback on assignments that have made an impact on students. While assignments and disciplines varied, consistent patterns emerged. Below is a summary of what we learned and resources for faculty who want to incorporate these elements into their teaching.

What is an assignment that has really helped you learn?

Student Voices

This video features students describing an assignment that has stood out to them and why it has made an impact on their academic career.

Below we will focus on the three most dominant themes; choice, authentic learning, and active learning through hands-on experience.

Student Quotes and Patterns

Choice

Student responses highlighted the importance of choice in assignments. One student stated:

“For a criminal justice research methods paper, we conducted independent research on a topic of our own choosing and reviewed literature on our chosen topics to write a research proposal…this was very engaging because of the element of choosing a topic that I am passionate about.”

Responses like this point to a consistent pattern: when students are given freedom of choice, they have deeper engagement and motivation. Motivation research, such as the self-determination theory, shows that autonomy can significantly increase engagement. Students go from having to do an assignment to wanting to do an assignment. Structure does not need to be sacrificed, but by providing choice students feel more engaged while still achieving learning outcomes.

Authentic Learning

Another strong theme was the application of concepts learned in the course to real-life scenarios as a form of authentic learning. A student wrote about writing a policy letter in their English 101 Writing and Rhetoric course:

“I had to write a policy letter to my local theatre company asking them to renovate the auditorium. This assignment helped me connect rhetoric tools to real life scenarios and gave me a better understanding of them.”

This student emphasized the importance of applying course concepts, specifically outside of the classroom. This assignment allowed students not only to recall what they were learning, but to use that knowledge and apply it to a real situation. Instead of simply defining concepts, they were being put to action, which deepened understanding and strengthened retention. Authentic learning helps bridge the gap between what is learned in the classroom and what is expected beyond.

Active Learning through Hands-on Experience

A third pattern we observed was student appreciation for hands-on experience. One student reflected on their hands-on experience in their GEOG 141 course:

“We have had multiple assignments where we were able to look at fossils. We looked at different fossils and were suppose to identify them and figure out what something might have originally been. I chose this because I found it very impactful and useful to have the hands-on experience.”

Experiences like this show that through hands-on experience, conceptual ideas turn into something tangible that students are able to interact with. Students can modify, test, and engage with the concepts. Participating in hands-on experience gives students a memorable experience, leading to higher knowledge retention. In addition to this, hands-on experience shows students what their field of study can look like in practice.

 

Creating Impactful Learning Opportunities

Factoring in Choice

Integrating choice into assignments can be done in small ways to maintain learning outcomes of the course. Ways to incorporate choice includes providing 2-3 discussion prompts students can choose from, allowing students to choose a topic for a paper, or choice in participating in projects with a group or individually.

Incorporating choice through elements of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework can benefit students. The UDL focuses on engagement, action and expression, and representation with a goal to create a more inclusive learning environment. The CFC offers a 4-week asynchronous course centered around the UDL framework. This course begins Monday, March 2 and you can register for the UDL (Universal Design for Learning) Cohort using this link.

Integrating Authentic Learning Opportunities

Authentic assessments allow students to apply knowledge and skills to real-world situations. “Authentic assessments can be designed using different teaching methods like inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, problem-based learning, scenario-based learning, or design-based learning,” (Messier, 2022). Scenario-based assignments, for example, that incorporate problem-solving are effective ways to achieve this. Some examples include creating a mock business plan, completing problem sets that mimic the structure of a research article so students can follow the discovery process, role-playing a pitch to fictional or real clients, or engaging in a triple jump exercise (a three-step learning activity where students analyze a real-world problem, conduct research, and present their solution).

Incorporating Active Learning

Active learning allows students to engage with course material through application activities. Active learning teaching tools vary widely and offer many benefits to both students and instructors. Students are given the opportunity to think, talk, problem solve and gain immediate feedback from instructors. Instructors can use these techniques to build community and gain insight into how students think and engage with course content. Active learning often incorporates hands-on learning, creating tangible experiences for students. Examples include performing lab experiments, using tools relevant to the field, and handling real data. These findings align with research that shows the academic and personal value of hands-on and collaborative, active learning.

 

Conclusion

Student feedback gathered showed that assignments that offer freedom of choice, and authentic and active learning experiences, specifically hands-on experiences, support impactful learning. Although backgrounds and majors were diverse, these themes appeared consistently throughout feedback, suggesting that these strategies help long-term learning throughout disciplines. Incorporating these strategies does not require a course redesign, rather, small changes can be made to highlight these strategies. Through intentional adjustments, instructors can foster engagement and retention to support long-term learning.

Clemmy Brophy is a student assistant at the CFC and collected the data for this project with the help of Gabriel Claros (also student assistant at the CFC) and April Tallant.

Citations and Resources

Give students choice, where appropriate. Eberly Center – Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d.). https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/teach/classroomclimate/strategies/choice.html

Gonzales, A. (2024, August 28). Implementing Student Choice within an Assignment. Center for Transformative Teaching | Nebraska. https://teaching.unl.edu/news/implementing-student-choice-within-assignment/

Harvard University (n.d.). Problem sets. The Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/problem-sets

Jach, E. A., & Trolian, T. L. (2020, September). EBSCOhost Research databases‎. Engagement in College and University Applied Learning Experiences and Students’ Academic Motivation. https://research.ebsco.com/c/y6sumr/viewer/html/r2m23bw4lv?auth-callid=38974c40-e247-4d39-86c7-7c488d5f07c5

Kuh, G., O’Donnell, K., & Schneider, C. G. (2017). HIPs at Ten. Change (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 49(5), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1366805

The UDL guidelines. CAST Universal Design for Learning Guidelines. (n.d.). https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

University of New Brunswick (n.d.). Creating effective scenarios, case studies, and role plays. Centre for Enhanced Teaching & Learning. https://www.unb.ca/fredericton/cetl/services/teaching-tips/instructional-methods/creating-effective-scenarios,-case-studies-and-role-plays.html

What Are The Benefits of Hands-On Learning? NewSchool of Architecture & Design. (2019, January 21). https://newschoolarch.edu/what-are-the-benefits-of-hands-on-learning/

What is Experiential Learning Theory? University of the People. (2025, October 13). https://www.uopeople.edu/blog/what-is-experiential-learning-theory/

Weir, K. (2025, March 2). Self-determination theory: A quarter century of human motivation research. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/research-practice/conduct-research/self-determination-theory

Campus Community Connections – February 2026

Highlighting Opportunities and News from our Campus Partners

Black History Month at 100: Reclaiming the Legacy of Dr. Carter G. Woodson’s Black History Month and the War Over Historical Erasure 

  • February 3: “In the Legacy of Black History: The Revolutionary Praxis of Malcolm X.: Dr. Richard Benson, Professor, University of Pittsburgh 
  • February 5: Global Black Studies Inaugural Undergraduate Student Research Conference: “A Century of Struggle, Scholarship, and Survival: Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?” 
  • February 10: “The ‘Mis-Education’ of 2026: Modern Erasure and Woodson’s Warning.” Dr. Alicia Fontnette, Director of the National Council for Black Studies and Assistant Professor of Africana Studies, University of Delaware 
  • February 17: “When the Witness Becomes the Record: on ‘Bombingham’ and the Record of Racial Terror in Birmingham, Alabama.” Mr. Dale Long, Survivor of the 1963 16th Street Baptist Church Bombing, Birmingham, Alabama 
  • February 19: “Commemoration or Confrontation? Interrogating if Black History Month Needs a Makeover” 

All events held in Apodaca Science Building, Room 123 @ 2:00 pm. 

From the Center for Community Engagement & Service Learning (CCESL)

SLC/CEC Faculty Roundtable 

February 18, 2026 (Wednesday) | 3:30 – 4:30 pm Hunter Library 156 (CFC Conference Room) 

For All Interested Faculty: Come discuss service-learning and community experience courses with WCU faculty Dr. Brian Byrd (School of Health Sciences) and Dr. Patricia Bricker (School of Teaching and Learning). This roundtable conversation will feature opportunities to hear about their experiences, to learn about the designation process (coming March 2nd!), and provide an open forum to exchange ideas. Questions? Contact CCESL Director Joy Mischley (jmischley@wcu.edu). A Zoom option is available for those not able to attend in-person (https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81328274742) 

Community-Engaged Courses: Upcoming Deadline 

The Service-Learning Course (SLC) and Community Experience Course (CEC) designation process for Fall/Summer 2026 courses is currently underway. The initial designation process involves the faculty member completing a brief (~9 min) form. Please refer to the CCESL website for more information or contact Joy Mischley, Director (jmischley@wcu.edu). If you submitted your course during one of the deadlines last year, you do not need to repeat the process this year. Instead, CCESL will contact you individually about completing a brief renewal. 

Deadline: Monday, March 2, 2026, for Summer & Fall 2026 courses 

QR code for staff senate

Staff Senate

Staff Senate is here for you.

Website: staffsenate.wcu.edu

We Recommend: The Missing Course

Teaching in the GenAI Era:
Three Key Insights from The Missing Course

February 2026

Recommended by Scott Seagle, Educational Developer  

David Gooblar’s The Missing Course offers practical, research-backed strategies for college instructors looking to enhance their teaching effectiveness. At the heart of his approach is constructivist learning theory, the idea that students must actively construct their own knowledge rather than passively receive information. Here are three essential areas where you can apply these principles in your courses. 

First, adopt active learning strategies to create student investment in your course. Moving beyond lecture-centered teaching requires building a genuine partnership with students. Start by explaining the science behind active learning on day one to establish expectations for participation (Gooblar, pg. 22). While grades motivate students, the key to lasting engagement is helping them take ownership of their learning. 

Consider adopting these strategies:  

  • Leave portions of your syllabus open for student input on topics and assignments (Gooblar, pg. 54) 
  • Frame your syllabus as a compelling “sales pitch” that connects course content to students’ lives and pressing questions in the field 
  • Reduce your talk time during class and let students drive discussions 
  • Have students teach concepts to each other 

Second, in your assessments, make your feedback work for your students. The distinction between summative assessment (measuring mastery) and formative assessment (guiding improvement) is crucial. Formative approaches allow students to learn from mistakes through repeated practice and targeted feedback, but only if that feedback is truly usable (Gooblar, pg.131). 

Consider adopting these strategies: 

  • Review exams with students, focusing on commonly missed questions and offering follow-up quizzes on those concepts 
  • Try two-stage exams (also called pyramid exams or cooperative exams) where students first take a test individually, then immediately retake it in groups 
  • Share with students at the start of the term why you give feedback, how they’ll receive it, and what you expect them to do with it 
  • Utilize different types of feedback (peer feedback, support from online sources) and in varied formats (written, audio, in-person) 
  • Ensure feedback is frequent and directly tied to learning outcomes 

The goal isn’t just to justify grades but to give students agency in improving their work. 

Finally, emphasize process over product. This is increasingly important given the challenges we’re all experiencing with GenAI. Students learn by observing expert processes. As instructors, we need to make our own thinking visible. 

Consider adopting these strategies:  

  • Demonstrate confidence in your course design and its relevance to students’ lives 
  • Embrace “modeling stupidity” by openly acknowledging knowledge gaps and mistakes, then show students how you work through difficult questions (Gooblar, pg. 160) 
  • Discuss scholarly work in class, revealing the processes that have shaped your expertise 
  • Teach not just disciplinary rules but their function and history, helping students understand the reasoning behind conventions 
  • Have students intentionally break rules or make mistakes, then analyze what went wrong. This metacognitive work helps them understand processes more deeply. Gooblar suggests making students break those rules because by “inviting students to write badly, or perform an experiment incorrectly, or botch an equation’s solution and then share their mistakes, we can get students to think about their processes of writing or performing experiments or solving equations. Once they start thinking about those processes, we can start helping them do them right” (Gooblar, pg. 176) 

Constructivist teaching isn’t about abandoning content delivery; it’s about recognizing that disseminating information and helping students construct knowledge are two different objectives. By centering active learning, meaningful assessment, and visible expert processes, you can create learning experiences where students become genuine collaborators in their own education. 

To access the full collection of teaching-related recommendations, visit CFC’s We Recommend.

SoTL Scholar Feature: Amanda Storm

The SoTL Scholar Feature highlights the work of WCU faculty participating in the SoTL (Scholarship of Teaching and Learning) Academy, a program sponsored by the Coulter Faculty Commons.  
Headshot of Amanda Storm.

Our current SoTL Scholar Feature focuses on Amanda Storm, a faculty member in the Department of Biology in the College of Arts and Sciences. Dr. Storm has extensive research experience in understanding how aspects of protein sequence and structure translate into functional diversity. She has taught at WCU for over 7 years. Her courses include General Biology II, Biotechnology First Year Seminar, Introduction to Genetics, Principles of Biotechnology and Protein Bioinformatics.  

What started you on your SoTL journey?  

I was first introduced to learning theory and pedagogy when I was able to take some science education courses and attend a Lilly Conference during my PhD. My interest in science and ‘how things work’ extends to ‘how we learn’ (which is basically biochemistry) but, though I applied ideas from SoTL, I hadn’t made time to start a SoTL project myself until recently. The main obstacle was the time and guidance needed to plan and apply the systematic aspects of intentional data collection and analysis.  

 

How has joining the SoTL Academy impacted your work? 

With all the responsibilities that faculty have to juggle, for me to add the SoTL plate to the mix required the encouragement, support and accountability that the SoTL Academy offered. The retreat offered a dedicated time to plan, the continued, periodic events kept progress moving, and the connection to people of various expertise helped navigate challenges and best practices.

 

What type of SoTL research are you conducting? 

My current project relates to understanding student use of course materials. It stemmed from an initial pilot of switching my sophomore Genetics course from a textbook to OER material, so I was providing students with course material in different formats including presentation slides, online articles and textbook sections, tutorial videos, animations, and interactives. I wondered if students would have a preference for a particular format of course material, given the choice.  So, that is what I ended up just asking students through peer-led interviews conducted by a student researcher while also monitoring if there are differences in what course materials students access on Canvas.  

 

Anything else you would like to share? 

To add a plug for the CFC – even if you don’t have an interest in adding another project to your life, SoTL events never fail to be an encouraging, up-lifting experience for me. They are an opportunity to validate the challenges of teaching, celebrate our successes and affirm the importance of the efforts we put into quality teaching. 

Want to Learn more about SoTL at WCU?
Check out the CFC’s Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) page

Academic Integrity at WCU: Key Insights from a Fall 2025 Student Survey

Written by Gabriel Claros and Clemmy Brophy,
CFC Student Assistants

Academic integrity plays a central role in shaping the learning environment and the long-term value of a degree from Western Carolina University. To better understand how students perceive academic integrity and where additional support may be needed, 58 students participated in an anonymous survey during the 14th Annual Recalibrate Your Compass event in Fall 2025 

Their responses reveal a campus community that overwhelmingly values honesty yet still faces challenges in navigating expectations and academic pressure. This data suggests that while students deeply value academic honesty, they still benefit from clear expectations and faculty support to consistently uphold it. 

The survey results provide valuable insight into how students experience academic integrity on a practical, day-to-day level. One of the strongest findings is that students (N=58) feel comfortable communicating with faculty about academic integrity. Almost all respondents (96%, n=56) reported that they feel very or somewhat comfortable asking professors questions about what constitutes cheating or plagiarism. This indicates that many faculty members are already fostering an approachable and supportive atmosphere. Only a small number of students (n=2) expressed discomfort, further suggesting communicating clear and consistent expectations across courses would be beneficial to students.

CFC Student Assistants, Gabriel and Clemmy, sitting behind a table during an event.

Gabriel (pictured on the left) and Clemmy (pictured on the right) are student assistants at the CFC, both are in their first semester at Western. Gabriel is majoring in Mechanical Engineering and Clemmy is majoring in Marketing.  

Students also expressed a strong sense of understanding regarding academic integrity policies. A remarkable 98% (n=57) agreed that they have a good understanding of what constitutes a violation of an academic integrity at WCU. Similarly, over three quarters of the students (79%, n=46) feel very confident about their professors’ expectations around generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in coursework. This highlights the benefits of having ongoing conversations in the classroom, ensuring that expectations are transparent and aligned with departmental and course objectives. 

Perhaps the most striking takeaway is how deeply students value integrity itself. Every participant stated that acting with academic integrity is important to them. When asked how integrity affects the value of their degree, students used words like value, earned, legitimate, and ownership to describe why honest work matters. Their responses reflect a strong internal motivation to do work that they can be proud of, reinforcing the idea that academic integrity is not merely a policy, but a personal commitment shared across campus. 

Students also reported positive observations of integrity in their peers. 74% (n=43) have “observed a peer at WCU practice academic integrity,” and 86% (n=50) believe that most WCU students act with integrity most of the time. These perceptions matter because they shape the culture of the institution: when students believe their peers are committed to honest work, they are more likely to hold themselves to the same standard (Tatum & Schwartz, 2017). 

Despite this overwhelmingly positive outlook, the survey also revealed challenges that commonly interfere with students’ ability to uphold academic integrity. Students were asked what the biggest challenges are that stand in the way of maintaining academic integrity. For this question, students could select multiple answers. 

Challenges students face in maintaining academic integrity

Bar chart showing challenges students face in maintaining academic integrity (multiple answers).

The challenge students selected the most was time pressure (n=43). Heavy workloads, overlapping deadlines, and personal responsibilities can lead students to feel rushed or overwhelmed, increasing the temptation to cut corners. Lack of confidence in their own work (n=25), unclear expectations (n=19), and the temptation to seek unauthorized help (n=16) were the three other challenges students selected in the survey. These challenges suggest that violations of academic integrity are often less about intent and more about time-crunches, stress, uncertainty, or feeling unprepared.

The survey also exposed a few knowledge gaps. While most students demonstrated a solid understanding of academic integrity, only 60% (n=35) correctly identified fabrication as the act of creating or falsifying information. The remaining students confused this term with plagiarism (n=16), self-plagiarism (n=5), or facilitation (n=2), highlighting the need for continued education on the distinctions between these concepts. 

Overall, the survey results suggest a campus that is committed to integrity but still navigating the pressures and complexities of modern academic life. Instructors can play a key role by clarifying expectations, especially around ethical GenAI use, and how to properly cite sources, and by recognizing the impact of external factors on student decision-making. Meanwhile, students can continue to contribute to a culture of honesty by asking questions, seeking support when needed, and reflecting on the long-term value of earning their degree with integrity.

Reference 

Tatum, H., & Schwartz, B. M. (2017). Honor codes: Evidence based strategies for improving academic integrity. Theory into Practice56(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1308175