Student Feedback on Impactful Learning

During the 2025 Fall semester, the CFC conducted a project to understand what types of assignments students find the most impactful. We asked students, “What is an assignment that has really helped you learn?” Through hosting a table event, collecting responses through a survey, and gathering video interviews, we have received feedback on assignments that have made an impact on students. While assignments and disciplines varied, consistent patterns emerged. Below is a summary of what we learned and resources for faculty who want to incorporate these elements into their teaching.

What is an assignment that has really helped you learn?

Student Voices

This video features students describing an assignment that has stood out to them and why it has made an impact on their academic career.

Below we will focus on the three most dominant themes; choice, authentic learning, and active learning through hands-on experience.

Student Quotes and Patterns

Choice

Student responses highlighted the importance of choice in assignments. One student stated:

“For a criminal justice research methods paper, we conducted independent research on a topic of our own choosing and reviewed literature on our chosen topics to write a research proposal…this was very engaging because of the element of choosing a topic that I am passionate about.”

Responses like this point to a consistent pattern: when students are given freedom of choice, they have deeper engagement and motivation. Motivation research, such as the self-determination theory, shows that autonomy can significantly increase engagement. Students go from having to do an assignment to wanting to do an assignment. Structure does not need to be sacrificed, but by providing choice students feel more engaged while still achieving learning outcomes.

Authentic Learning

Another strong theme was the application of concepts learned in the course to real-life scenarios as a form of authentic learning. A student wrote about writing a policy letter in their English 101 Writing and Rhetoric course:

“I had to write a policy letter to my local theatre company asking them to renovate the auditorium. This assignment helped me connect rhetoric tools to real life scenarios and gave me a better understanding of them.”

This student emphasized the importance of applying course concepts, specifically outside of the classroom. This assignment allowed students not only to recall what they were learning, but to use that knowledge and apply it to a real situation. Instead of simply defining concepts, they were being put to action, which deepened understanding and strengthened retention. Authentic learning helps bridge the gap between what is learned in the classroom and what is expected beyond.

Active Learning through Hands-on Experience

A third pattern we observed was student appreciation for hands-on experience. One student reflected on their hands-on experience in their GEOG 141 course:

“We have had multiple assignments where we were able to look at fossils. We looked at different fossils and were suppose to identify them and figure out what something might have originally been. I chose this because I found it very impactful and useful to have the hands-on experience.”

Experiences like this show that through hands-on experience, conceptual ideas turn into something tangible that students are able to interact with. Students can modify, test, and engage with the concepts. Participating in hands-on experience gives students a memorable experience, leading to higher knowledge retention. In addition to this, hands-on experience shows students what their field of study can look like in practice.

 

Creating Impactful Learning Opportunities

Factoring in Choice

Integrating choice into assignments can be done in small ways to maintain learning outcomes of the course. Ways to incorporate choice includes providing 2-3 discussion prompts students can choose from, allowing students to choose a topic for a paper, or choice in participating in projects with a group or individually.

Incorporating choice through elements of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework can benefit students. The UDL focuses on engagement, action and expression, and representation with a goal to create a more inclusive learning environment. The CFC offers a 4-week asynchronous course centered around the UDL framework. This course begins Monday, March 2 and you can register for the UDL (Universal Design for Learning) Cohort using this link.

Integrating Authentic Learning Opportunities

Authentic assessments allow students to apply knowledge and skills to real-world situations. “Authentic assessments can be designed using different teaching methods like inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, problem-based learning, scenario-based learning, or design-based learning,” (Messier, 2022). Scenario-based assignments, for example, that incorporate problem-solving are effective ways to achieve this. Some examples include creating a mock business plan, completing problem sets that mimic the structure of a research article so students can follow the discovery process, role-playing a pitch to fictional or real clients, or engaging in a triple jump exercise (a three-step learning activity where students analyze a real-world problem, conduct research, and present their solution).

Incorporating Active Learning

Active learning allows students to engage with course material through application activities. Active learning teaching tools vary widely and offer many benefits to both students and instructors. Students are given the opportunity to think, talk, problem solve and gain immediate feedback from instructors. Instructors can use these techniques to build community and gain insight into how students think and engage with course content. Active learning often incorporates hands-on learning, creating tangible experiences for students. Examples include performing lab experiments, using tools relevant to the field, and handling real data. These findings align with research that shows the academic and personal value of hands-on and collaborative, active learning.

 

Conclusion

Student feedback gathered showed that assignments that offer freedom of choice, and authentic and active learning experiences, specifically hands-on experiences, support impactful learning. Although backgrounds and majors were diverse, these themes appeared consistently throughout feedback, suggesting that these strategies help long-term learning throughout disciplines. Incorporating these strategies does not require a course redesign, rather, small changes can be made to highlight these strategies. Through intentional adjustments, instructors can foster engagement and retention to support long-term learning.

Clemmy Brophy is a student assistant at the CFC and collected the data for this project with the help of Gabriel Claros (also student assistant at the CFC) and April Tallant.

Citations and Resources

Give students choice, where appropriate. Eberly Center – Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d.). https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/teach/classroomclimate/strategies/choice.html

Gonzales, A. (2024, August 28). Implementing Student Choice within an Assignment. Center for Transformative Teaching | Nebraska. https://teaching.unl.edu/news/implementing-student-choice-within-assignment/

Harvard University (n.d.). Problem sets. The Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/problem-sets

Jach, E. A., & Trolian, T. L. (2020, September). EBSCOhost Research databases‎. Engagement in College and University Applied Learning Experiences and Students’ Academic Motivation. https://research.ebsco.com/c/y6sumr/viewer/html/r2m23bw4lv?auth-callid=38974c40-e247-4d39-86c7-7c488d5f07c5

Kuh, G., O’Donnell, K., & Schneider, C. G. (2017). HIPs at Ten. Change (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 49(5), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1366805

The UDL guidelines. CAST Universal Design for Learning Guidelines. (n.d.). https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

University of New Brunswick (n.d.). Creating effective scenarios, case studies, and role plays. Centre for Enhanced Teaching & Learning. https://www.unb.ca/fredericton/cetl/services/teaching-tips/instructional-methods/creating-effective-scenarios,-case-studies-and-role-plays.html

What Are The Benefits of Hands-On Learning? NewSchool of Architecture & Design. (2019, January 21). https://newschoolarch.edu/what-are-the-benefits-of-hands-on-learning/

What is Experiential Learning Theory? University of the People. (2025, October 13). https://www.uopeople.edu/blog/what-is-experiential-learning-theory/

Weir, K. (2025, March 2). Self-determination theory: A quarter century of human motivation research. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/research-practice/conduct-research/self-determination-theory

Exploring GenAI Learning Series @WCU

Faculty, staff, and administrators are invited to participate in a new AI-focused professional learning series that explores how generative AI is reshaping teaching, learning, and everyday work in higher education. This collaborative series is being offered by Coulter Faculty Commons, Hunter Library, and IT.

The series features three sessions, including From Detection to Design: Rethinking Assignments with GenAI in MindEveryday GenAI at WorkBoosting Efficiency with Microsoft Copilot, and Evaluating AI Information for ReliabilityTogether, these workshops provide practical strategies, shared language, and campus-informed perspectives to help participants thoughtfully engage with AI tools while supporting effective pedagogy, responsible use, and institutional goals. 

 

 

From Detection to Design: Rethinking Assignments with GenAI in Mind

Friday, February 6 | 11:15 am – 12:45 pm 

In this workshop, instructors will explore how and why structural changes to assignments are essential in the age of generative AI (GenAI). Drawing on current research, the session emphasizes designing assessments that promote learning, integrity, and student engagement rather than attempting to “AI‑proof” coursework. 

 

 

Everyday GenAI at Work: Boosting Efficiency with Microsoft Copilot 

Friday, March 20 | 10:00 – 11:30 am

Discover how Microsoft Copilot can transform your daily workflow. This session will explore practical ways to integrate AI into routine tasks—drafting documents, summarizing content, analyzing data, and more. Learn tips and best practices to streamline processes, save time, and enhance productivity using Microsoft Copilot. Perfect for anyone looking to work smarter, not harder.

 

 

Evaluating AI Information for Reliability

Friday, April 17 | 1:00 – 2:00 pm

This session acknowledges the value of the (trained) human eye when working with new technologies, such as AI, to ensure that the information is accurate and reliable, and can therefore be used for some purpose/application (to make decisions, solve problems, etc.) without issue. The goal of the session is for participants to learn how to critically evaluate GenAI outputs to determine if the information can be trusted and used reliably, while enhancing our overall thinking skills. 

We Recommend: Talk is cheap: why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI

Rethinking Assignment Design in the Age of GenAI

January 2026

Recommended by April Tallant, Director  

Generative AI is reshaping higher education, and our assessment practices must evolve to keep pace. Many institutions have introduced frameworks like traffic light systems, AI use scales, and mandatory declarations. These are helpful first steps because they give us language and structure while we find our bearings. But as Corbin, Dawson, and Liu (2025) argue in Talk is Cheap: Why Structural Assessment Changes Are Needed for a Time of GenAI, these approaches are limited; they rely on student compliance with unenforceable rules. The authors call these approaches discursive changes, or modifications that work through instructions without altering the tasks. Discursive changes alter the communication about the assignment, not the assessment itself. A simple example of discursive change is adding ‘GenAI use is not permitted in this assessment’ to existing assessment instructions. 

The authors argue that discursive changes to assessments are well-intentioned but flawed because they assume students understand ambiguous rules and will comply even when non-compliance is advantageous. Discursive changes also work on the assumption that compliance can be verified, but current AI-detection tools are limited. The authors state, “current detection tools are fraught with false positives and negatives, creating uncertainty and mistrust rather than clarity and accountability” (p. 1092). 

By contrast, Corbin, Dawson, and Liu argue that structural changes, “create assessment environments where the desired behavior emerges naturally from the assessment design” (p. 1093). In other words, structural changes modify the tasks, not the instructions. An example of a structural change provided by the authors include adding a “checkpoint in live assessment requiring tutor signoff on lab work.” Structural changes focus on the process, not the outcome. One example the authors offer: Rather than a final essay, students might participate in live discussions about their idea development and how their thinking developed based on feedback. Another structural change example includes designing assessments that connect throughout the term. Students build on their earlier work, demonstrating their learning across touchpoints, not from one task alone. 

The authors conclude that long-term solutions require rethinking assessment design so that validity is built into the structure, not just explained in instructions. The challenge of assessment design continues as GenAI advances. Our time as educators is better spent on structural redesign of assessment to ensure assessment validity that demonstrates student capabilities. 

 

Action item 1:

Have you modified your assessments with a structural approach? We’d love to hear from you! Join us for the AI Forum on Tuesday, Jan 27, 3:30 – 5:00 pm either in person or on Zoom to share your experience. 

 

Action item 2:

After reading the article, consider the following questions:  

    • The article suggests shifting from product-focused to process-focused assessment. What “authenticated checkpoints” could you realistically build into your lessons or modules to capture a student’s developmental process? 
    • Think of an assessment you believe works well. What about the task itself encourages the kind of learning you want?
    • What are barriers to making structural changes to assignments? How can we overcome them?
  1. Do you want to chat about this article? Send me an email (atallant@wcu.edu) and I’ll stop by your office or meet you on Zoom. 
  2.  

Action item 3:

Consider registering for CFC’s assignment re-design workshop in February! 

 

Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (2025). Talk is cheap: why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education50(7), 1087–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964 

A group of people gather around a table covered with papers, collaborating on a project.

Photo credit: Canva Pro; Monkey Business Images.

Teaching Analysis Polls (TAPs) registration is open for Spring

Spring 2026 TAPs Dates

Teaching Analysis Polls (TAPs), the CFC’s mid-semester assessment program, will run from Monday, February 16 – Friday, March 6 during the 2026 Spring semester.   

Why sign up for a TAP? 

Get feedback from your students when it matters most: while you are actually teaching your class.

  • Improve student learning: Make small teaching changes now and see the benefits for your current class. 
  • Promote inclusive teaching: Show students you value their input by collecting feedback and making meaningful changes. 
  • Document your teaching: Highlight your responsiveness to student needs in your teaching materials.
Optimize your teaching in less than 2 hours with a TAP. Coulter Faculty Commons

This is what past participants have to say:

The TAP process was an easy and helpful one to improve my student engagement and outcomes. I recommend participating for all faculty looking to improve their courses via student feedback.

Reece Hayes

College of Health and Human Sciences

As a professor, the only feedback I tend to get is from student evaluation data at the conclusion of the semester. I appreciate the CFC for providing this opportunity to gather feedback from students mid-semester, as it was valuable formative feedback. Meeting with the CFC staff member to discuss the feedback and actionable steps I could take for the rest of the semester and beyond was the personalized professional development I needed to reflect on my teaching, as well as my students’ learning.

Roya Q. Scales

College of Education and Allied Professions

  • TAPs are available to anyone who teaches at WCU and are completely confidential.
  • We are offering in-person options at both the main campus and Biltmore Park, as well as online options for evening or remote classes. 

Please reach out to Anabel Livengood at llivengood@wcu.edu if you have any questions.

QR code for TAPs Registration (Spring 2026)

Do You Have a Minute?

Teaching & Learning Tip: Engage Your Students in Just One Minute

Think about ways that you can help your students set short-term academic goals – ones that are challenging, but attainable. You might review some goals with a class that will be met over the next couple of weeks, for example. And then ask your students to set their own goals dealing with a particular content area. The students could then outline what they need to do to meet those goals and identify what resources they need from you to help them meet those goals. By helping students realize what they can do to control their own learning, you can help students begin to take responsibility for their own learning.

Clock showing the time of one minute after twelve.

Another activity to build on this idea is the One Minute Paper. These quick, short bits of writing can help students check what they know. Hand out paper slips to your students or ask them to pick them up as they come into the classroom. Ask students to write an answer to a question about the content, lecture, or chapter for one minute (yes, time them!). 

The question prompt for these papers is an important component of the activity. Traditionally, the two questions used are “What was the most important topic in today’s class?” and “What questions do you still have on this topic?” (Chiou et al. 2014, Campbell et al. 2019). Collect the papers for review or ask students to review each other’s answers and discuss. Research on the use of minute papers has shown increased student learning (Stead 2005, Chiou et al. 2014) and reduced anxiety (Chiou et al. 2014). Students also indicated that minute papers were beneficial to their learning (Stead 2004, Chiou et al. 2014).

 

References

Campbell, M., E. M. Abel, and R. Lucio (2019). The one-minute paper as a catalyst for change in online pedagogy. Journal of Teaching in Social Work 39:519-533.

Chiou, C., Y. Wang, L. Lee (2014). Reducing statistical anxiety and enhancing statistics learning achievement: effectiveness of a one-minute strategy. Psychology Reports: 115:297-310.

Morrison-Shetlar, A., Marwitz, Mary R (2001). Teaching creatively: Ideas in action. Outernet Publishing.

Stead, D. R. 2005. A review of the one-minute paper. Active Learning in Higher Education 6:118-131.

How is your teaching going? TAPs are back

Teaching Analysis Polls (TAPs) return this Fall Semester

Fall 2025 TAPs Dates

Teaching Analysis Polls (TAPs), the CFC’s mid-semester assessment program, will run from Monday, September 22 – Friday, October 10 during the 2025 Fall semester.   

Optimize your teaching in less than 2 hours with a TAP. Coulter Faculty Commons
Why sign up for a TAP? 

Get feedback from your students when it matters most: while you are actually teaching your class.

  • Improve student learning: Make small teaching changes now and see the benefits for your current class. 
  • Promote inclusive teaching: Show students you value their input by collecting feedback and making meaningful changes. 
  • Document your teaching: Highlight your responsiveness to student needs in your teaching materials.

TAPs are available to anyone who teaches at WCU and are completely confidential. We are offering in-person options at both the main campus and Biltmore Park, as well as online options for evening or remote classes. 

Please reach out to Anabel Livengood at llivengood@wcu.edu if you have any questions.

QR code for fall TAPs registration