2026 UNC Board of Governors Excellence in Teaching Award Finalists

Meet the 2026 UNC Board of Governors Excellence in Teaching Award: Brian Byrd, Kim Hall, and Yang Zhang

Established in 1994, the UNC Board of Governors Excellence in Teaching Award highlights the significance of teaching and aims to encourage, identify, recognize, reward, and support outstanding teaching within the university. Each year, a faculty member from each constituent institution is honored with this prestigious award.   

While the winner of the UNC Board of Governors Excellence in Teaching Award at WCU will be announced at the Faculty and Staff Excellence Award Ceremony this spring, we want to highlight the accomplishments of all three of our 2026 award finalists: Brian Byrd, Kim Hall, and Yang Zhang (in alphabetical order).  

All three finalists went through an extensive review process, including a teaching observation and an interview with the award committee, assembling their portfolio consisting of their teaching philosophy, teaching artifacts, as well as letters of support from colleagues and former students. In the spotlights that follow, we highlight words of endorsement from their final submission packages, including excerpts from their teaching philosophies as well as excerpts from former students’ letters to the award committee that speak for themselves.  

Please congratulate these three colleagues on the tremendous achievement of having been named a finalist! 

Finalist Spotlight: Brian Byrd

Brian Byrd (PhD, MSPH) is a Professor in the Environmental Health Sciences program, College of Health and Human Sciences, and has been at WCU since 2008 

Dr. Byrd teaches courses such as Epidemiologic Methods, Vector-borne Disease Control, First Year Seminar, and Global Health. His research focuses on domestic mosquito‐borne diseases, specifically La Crosse encephalitis, the ecology of invasive mosquitoes and ticks, and the molecular identification of arthropod vectors. He also maintains an active undergraduate research program where his students have been nationally recognized. 

Photo of Brian Byrd, standing outside and smiling.

Describing his own educational journey in a personal narrative, Dr. Byrd summarizes: “My overriding goal (i.e., “my calling”) is to provide students opportunities to help them succeed. For some, it may just be getting them successfully through a First Year Seminar course while they are struggling during their first semester at college. For others, it may be sparking an interest in public health or a public service career. For some it may be making room for them to apply what they are learning in a way that is meaningful to them. For many it means sharing my professional networks or resources. For some it means pointing them in a direction and getting out of their way (but being available if there are hiccups). For others, it goes far deeper. For these students, it is best to hear (read) their words.”  

One of his former students, Marissa Taylor, MPH, now works for the CDC and shares the following about Dr. Byrd: “He understands how to motivate students, which I think is due to his personal nature as a lifelong learner. Though Brian’s courses are academically challenging, they were always well regarded, as he added boots on the ground fieldwork to normally dreaded group projects. Training beyond the classroom was integral to my success as a scientist; his classes were where the rubber met the road – had we gathered adequate data about our specimens? Had we packed enough forceps? Heightening our engagement, we were pursuing contemporary research questions with tangible impacts. My group field collected Ixodes scapularis ticks, which transmit Lyme disease, and needed to be tracked on their southward expansion into western North Carolina. Students were empowered through these experiences, which bestowed more responsibility than typical for undergraduate students.”  

Similarly, another of his former students, Lieutenant Corey Day, MS, PhD, who now works for the United States Navy, illustrates Dr. Byrd’s approach to (most literal) hands-on teaching with this recollection about a class: “The “skeeter” man showed up to our classroom with a cage filled with hundreds of mosquitoes, into which he promptly inserted his entire arm. While the mosquitoes fed on his blood, Brian explained his scientific role as a medical entomologist, including his mission to reduce the hidden burden of a little-known mosquito-borne disease that affected families in western North Carolina. […] His classes taught you how to think broadly and critically, organize projects, and work together as a team.” 

Professional headshot of Kim Hall, smiling into the camera.

Finalist Spotlight: Kim Hall 

Kim Hall (PhD) is an Associate Professor in the Environmental Health Program in the School of Health Sciences. Dr. Hall joined WCU in 2015 and currently teaches courses including Water Quality Control, Environmental Toxicology, Solid and Hazardous Materials Management, Introduction to Environmental Health, and others. She maintains an active undergraduate research program involving students in the evaluation, development, and modeling of fecal pollution and source indicators in surface water. 

In Dr. Hall’s own words, her teaching philosophy is “grounded in the belief that enthusiasm for learning is infectious. As an instructor, I bring my passion for science and public health into the classroom to inspire students to explore the environmental, social, economic, and political dimensions of global health challenges. I view education in environmental public health as both an intellectual and professional journey—one that equips students with the tools and mindsets needed to become skilled practitioners who protect the health and well-being of populations.” Ultimately, she is hoping that her approach to the classroom is “[…] helping students become thoughtful, engaged, and resilient practitioners.” 

Clint Pinion, Jr. (DrPH, EdD, EHAC Council Member) describes Dr. Hall’s instructional approach as follows: “Dr. Hall consistently designs and delivers courses that foster critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and evidence-based decision-making. Through the use of real-world case studies, field investigations, and project-based learning, she enables students to apply theoretical knowledge to contemporary environmental health challenges such as water quality, air pollution, waste management, and occupational safety. Her approach ensures that students understand not only the science underlying environmental health but also its policy and community implications.” 

Dr. Hall’s desire to prepare students for work that environmental health professionals will face once entering the workforce, becomes evident in Morgan Lawson’s (MS, CIH, CSP) description of her experience being a student: “One of the most effective teaching tools Dr. Hall implemented in her courses was stepping outside of the classroom and introducing us to real-life scenarios. For example, we participated in mock restaurant inspections and observed the water sanitation process at the campus treatment plant. She also engaged local environmental health professionals to share their experiences and provide different perspectives. Genuinely caring about the development of the next generation of Environmental health professionals is one of the many qualities that separate Dr. Hall from the rest. Her goal is to inspire a passion for environmental health and guide students to become knowledgeable and well-rounded.”  

Finalist Spotlight: Yang Zhang 

Yang Zhang (PhD) is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering + Technology and joined WCU in 2017. The courses Dr. Zhang teaches include Engineering Graphics, 3-D Solid Modeling, Advanced 3D Computer Modeling and Rapid Prototyping, Advanced Parametric Modeling and Design, and Engineering Statics, among others. His research interests center around advanced and additive manufacturing, including process parameters optimization, structural optimization, lattice structure design, sustainable material utilization, and life cycle assessment. 

Professional headshot of Yang Zhang, smiling into the camera.

Dr. Zhang describes his teaching style as follows: “My pedagogical philosophy centers around the belief that the most effective means of conveying subject matter is by kindling students’ interest. In all my courses, my foremost objective is to engender a deep fascination with the subject matter. Building upon this, I prioritize student involvement. This involves encouraging students to pose questions, fostering collaborative discussions among them before I provide answers, and inviting students to articulate their perspectives. Once a solid conceptual understanding has been established, I employ an object-oriented approach to planning and design, leveraging teamwork to enhance students’ problem analysis and problem-solving capabilities. I am consistently enthusiastic about integrating diverse instructional methods into my classes to stimulate student engagement and cultivate independent and critical thinking skills.” 

Ariel Colón-Rodríguez, now a PhD student in Nuclear Engineering at Virginia Tech, shares what it was like to take ENGR 132 – Engineering Graphics with Dr. Zhang: “I am grateful to have learned from him and benefited from the way he taught that class. Through his instruction, I came to appreciate how foundational engineering graphics is, a skill that has gradually faded with the growing reliance on modern software. Dr. Zhang reminded us why understanding the fundamentals of drawing, visualization, and interpretation remains essential for every great engineer. His patience, organization, and ability to engage with students from a variety of backgrounds made the course both approachable and meaningful, leaving a strong impression that shaped how I viewed engineering as a discipline.” 

Former student Catherine Johnson, who took multiple classes with Dr. Zhang, describes her learning experience for her final senior capstone project as follows: “Our team was chosen to work with AlonTree company based out of Asheville, North Carolina to redesign a neurological recovery device for rehabilitation purposes for stroke survivors. Throughout the entire year, Professor Zhang relentlessly gave our team his time, guidance and support to encourage our creativity and production of a top-of-the-line product for our sponsor’s company. During our weekly meetings, he prompted our team with creative ideas, problem solving methods and suggestions that challenged and inspired us to create and develop a very sleek and impressive design of a functionally sound and successful product. He also sought and successfully secured grant funding to support our whole team of four students to travel to Orlando, FL, to attend the AOTA (American Occupational Therapy Association) Inspire Annual Conference, which is the biggest conference in occupational therapy, to showcase our design.” 

The CFC would like to extend their sincere thanks to the dedicated work of the 2025-26 BOG committee: Alvin Malesky (chair), Channa De Silva (last year’s winner and next year’s committee chair), as well as committee members Hannah Buala, Joy Bowers-Campbell, Ethan Cheng, Isaiah Feken, James Hogan, Luke Manget, Minu Thomas, and Paul Yanik.  

The University of North Carolina Board of Governors will select 17 outstanding faculty members to receive the 2026 Awards for Excellence in Teaching.  

Microlearning Made Simple: What It Is and How to Do It

Microlearning is a pedagogy that works well in both in-person and online courses. While definitions of microlearning vary, there is at least some consensus on the benefits and how to approach it. At its core, microlearning delivers content in short, small chunks that can be accessed on demand. Other benefits include reduced cognitive load for students, better knowledge retention, improved learning outcomes, and student engagement. 

Here are some tips for incorporating microlearning into your classes: 

  1. Focus on one objective or concept. Determine the goal so you can structure the lesson and select the best medium given your objective. 
  2. Use one medium (videos are the most common) with multiple learning elements. Examples of learning elements include visuals, audio, quizzes, slideshows, PDFs, and links. PowerPoint is a nice medium because you can include video, visuals, and link out to PDFs and quizzes. 
  3. Keep it short and focused. Research indicates 30 seconds to up to 15 minutes, and if you are using video, bear in mind that videos longer than 9 minutes results in a drop in viewer attention. 
  4. Make it interactive. Enhance videos by embedding 1–2 quiz questions directly into them (for example, you can do this directly in Panopto), or by using slides that prompt students to guess an answer, then click to reveal the correct response on the following slide. 

It’s fun to explore ways to integrate microlearning into courses. For in-person classes, one effective approach is to assign a microlearning module as homework before class. This helps students prepare for an active learning experience when the class meets. In online courses, microlearning can be used as either standalone modules or be embedded within larger units.

If you’d like to explore microlearning further, consider stopping by the CFC to chat or schedule a consultation with one of our educational developers. 

References 

Balasundaram, S., Mathew, J., & Nair. S. (2024). Microlearning and learning performance in higher education: A post-test control group study. Journal of Learning for Development 11(1), 1-14.

Denojean-Mairet, M., López-Pernas, S., Agbo, F. J., & Tedre, M. (2024). A literature review on the integration of microlearning and social mediaSmart Learning Environments, 11(1), 46.

Kohnke, L. (2021). Optimizing microlearning for mobile learning. In Corbeil, J.R., B.H. Khan, & M.E. Corbeil (Eds.), Microlearning in the digital age [pre-print]. Routledge.

NC State Teaching Resources (n.d.). Micro-learning with digital tools. Available at: https://teaching-resources.delta.ncsu.edu/micro-learning-with-digital-tools/ 

Thillainadesan, J., Le Couteur, D. G., Haq, I., & Wilkinson, T. J. (2022). When I say… microlearningMedical education56(8), 791–792.

New Faculty Join the Catamount Community

The Office of the Provost and the Coulter Faculty Commons welcomed 60 new faculty on August 6-8 for New Faculty Orientation (NFO). Throughout the three-day event, new faculty members enjoyed a warm Catamount welcome from Chancellor Kelli R. Brown, Provost Starnes, Associate Provost Huffman, Vice Chancellor for Enrollment Management & Student Success Moultrie, and Faculty Senate Chair Alsayyed.  

Some sessions that stood out that new faculty highly recommended were: Colleague Connection (an interactive networking bingo game), Welcome to Success & Supporting Our Students (a panel and case discussions with Student Success and Student Affairs), and Ask Us Anything (a faculty panel where Brian Byrd, David Jons, and Tracy Mensah fielded questions).

As a result of attending NFO, 81% of respondents said their confidence levels in their preparedness to teach at WCU increased significantly; 85% reported their preparedness to support students increased significantly; and 93% reported that NFO gave them a sense of connection with the university. One new feature that helped connect new faculty to WCU was a short history walk across campus that was led by Peter Koch, Associate Director of the Mountain Heritage Center.  

Almost 40 campus partners participated in the resource fair, another highly rated component of NFO. One new faculty participant noted, “Overall, NFO was an outstanding experience. I learned so much about WCU’s rich history and how I can best service the university’s students and my colleagues. I’m very grateful to those who organized for providing new faculty with the space to meet and network with one another, too!” 

Group picture of NFO participants during the History Walk.
Percentage breakdown of NFO attendees' satisfaction.
Two new faculty chatting with each other during bingo.

30th Annual FALCON Conference (Virtual): A free conference for adjunct faculty and lecturers

The Faculty Academy on Excellence in Teaching at Indiana University presents the 30th Annual FALCON Conference themed Teaching with Purpose: Supporting Learners in a Changing World. The virtual conference, to be held September 26th, will explore how faculty can create responsive, student-centered learning spaces amid evolving challenges. Sessions will highlight strategies for building connection and resilience, designing flexible and accessible learning, and fostering environments where all students can thrive. 

Participants can easily register and then self-enroll in the course. Those without an Indiana University account can very quickly create a guest account. Session recordings from last year are also available to view. 

Strategies and Tools for Fall Class Planning

The Coulter Faculty Commons often entertains questions throughout the summer about ideas for fall teaching. Here, we share some of those commonly asked questions and our responses.

Q. Can a shift in the syllabus verbiage encourage a better learning environment?
A. Ken Bain, who conceptualized the term “the promising syllabus,” argues yes, in his book What the Best College Teachers Do. You can find an excerpt – and strategies for incorporating self-determination theory into a course, visual design elements, and more, on the Montclair State University website. You can find his book in the WCU library.

Q. What can I do in the first week of class to keep my students engaged all semester?
A. A professor from the University of New Mexico, Gary Smith, has shared a strategy he used on the first day, after many years of feeling his students were only learning at a surface level.

On the first day of class, he asked his students the following question: “I’d like you to think about your college education and this course in particular. Which of the following is most important to you?

1. Acquiring information (facts, principles, concepts)?
2. Learning how to use information and knowledge in new situations? or…
3. Developing lifelong learning skills?

He writes about the back-and-forth negotiation – and the wonderful outcome it had on his students and his course – in an article entitled First-Day Questions for the Learner-Centered Classroom (Smith, 2008). A highly recommended reading!

Q. Am I required to use the WCU syllabus template?
A. The WCU syllabus template has been offered for many years as a single document/place where institutional policies are maintained and updated.

Q. Is there anything new in the WCU syllabus template for fall 2020?
A. Yes, and they have been substantial. Over the past few months, the Coulter Faculty Commons has been steadily making changes to the university syllabus, based on the impacts brought about by COVID. In May, we included a statement about the use of Respondus Lockdown Browser and Lockdown Monitor, including instructions for students to download the software. In June, we provided the university statement on the wearing of masks (this was revised again in August to include faculty processes when students are non-compliant). In August, we also published an update to the Course Recording and Broadcasting sub-section. The two major changes are 1) the need for faculty to obtain student waivers (to adhere to FERPA), 2) the particular need for waivers if faculty intend to use a video for a governed research project (outside normal class use case), and 3) language in a faculty syllabus if they intend to use Lockdown Browser or Lockdown Monitor.

Q. Have there been recent changes to the CFC Syllabus webpage?
A. Yes. In early August, we added a MWF and TR calendar document for faculty to use and distribute to their students. These are for fall 2020. We also added a link to Rice University’s Course Workload Estimator tool, to help faculty allocate hours and minutes to each activity, assignment, or lecture in an assigned week for a course in development (note: this tool is useful at any week in the term, for what lies ahead in a class). Due to the shift in online and remote teaching, we have had a lot of questions about “how much work is too much?” This tool helps you decide.

Q. Do I need to include all the institutional policies in my syllabus?
A. As stated above, if your syllabus includes a statement pointing to the Academic Toolbox, then you do not need to include those statements in your syllabus.

Q. What technology will be available in my classroom?

A. Upgraded Audio Features in Standard Classrooms
The Instructional Technology Team has been hard at work all summer trying to meet as many of the unprecedented needs of this coming fall as possible.  The CFC wanted to highlight a few things for faculty who are just returning to the university to teach hybrid courses.

As part of the preparations for hybrid teaching in WCU classrooms, additional audio connectivity was installed to allow for the use of a personal microphone, as well as to assist in the use of common software tools using the classroom audio system.

These enhancements include:

  • Expansion of the feed from the existing wireless lapel microphone to feed into audio recordings in Zoom and Panopto.
  • A Standard XLR Microphone Connection
  • Handheld XLR Microphones that are being distributed to the departments by the Provost’s office

For more information

 

The Instructional Technology Team and the Help Desk will have technicians available during the first two weeks of classes to troubleshoot issues.

Q. If I choose to record my classes, what responsibilities do I have?  Can students record me without my permission?

Students may make visual or audio recordings (Recording) of any class related content, using any approved recording device (e.g., smart phone, computer, digital recorder, etc.) upon the prior permission of the instructor and subject to the following restriction(s).  The Recording, along with the video capture of visible course materials (e.g., visible PowerPoint slides and/or visible lecture notes), shall be limited to the student’s personal, course related, educational use and shall be subject to all applicable copyright laws and institutional policies.  The student may not transfer, transmit, or otherwise disseminate the Recording to any third party, including classmates, without the permission of the instructor.  Any violation of these restrictions, or any other restriction verbally communicated by the instructor, may subject the student to the provisions of the WCU Academic Integrity Policy, the WCU Code of Student Conduct or both.

Meetings of this course may be broadcast and/or recorded. Broadcasting and recording are intended to complement the classroom experience. Instructors may broadcast and/or record courses for pedagogical use, student reference, to meet the accommodation needs of students with a documented disability, or any other reason deemed appropriate by WCU and/or the instructor.

Any recording of class that includes the image or voice of a student, or reference to the student’s name, would be considered FERPA, thus, protected. If faculty intend on making the recording available for future viewing (any viewing that is not live),it will require a waiver by each student.  The waivers may be collected by email or as a Canvas discussion board post or assignment with the following statement attached: By sending this email (by replying to this discussion board, by completing this electronic form – any use of WCU official identity verification) and typing my name below I acknowledge I have read and fully understand the terms of the VIDEO CONSENT AND RELEASE FORM FOR CLASS RECORDING and hereby release the University as stated in the Form.

If a student refuses to sign the waiver, then their likeness may not be included in any video made available. In other words, they would need to be excluded from video and not allowed to ask questions. If this happens faculty would be able to grade consistent with syllabi. In other words, the faculty member has the right to penalize the student by lowering their grade for not participating.  The faculty member is also free to create alternative assignments at his or her discretion.

Course recordings will be available to students registered for the course pursuant to applicable university policy and instructor preference.  All broadcasts and recordings are limited to personal, course related, educational use and may not be transmitted, transferred, distributed, sold, or posted on social media outlets without the written permission of the instructor. Unauthorized transmission, transfer, distribution, sale or posting of the broadcast and/or recording for any purpose other than the student’s personal, course related, educational use is not permitted. Students are expected to follow appropriate university policies and maintain the security of passwords used to access recorded materials.

If the Lockdown Browser and Monitor are being used, it is necessary that the instructor have both a syllabus statement and a waiver on file.

Any course recordings for purposes beyond the normal conduct of a course (promotional videos, videos related to a governed research project, etc.) will require an additional waiver and appropriate approval (such as IRB approval).

University Policy 122

For a more detailed version of when a waiver might be needed see:

Policy Considerations of Classroom Technology Use

Q. What are the supported synchronous streaming platforms?

Zoom.  There is limited support for Microsoft Teams, but it is not recommended for virtual course meetings beyond small groups at this time.

For more information see the Guidelines for Technology Use at WCU

Q. I’ve heard that the CFC isn’t recommending synchronous meetings with students physically present and at a distance?  Why is that?

Research and experience guide us to note that trying to hold class with a small group while trying to moderate interaction with students at a distance will lead to an inferior experience for everyone, including the instructor.  There are advantages and disadvantages to using synchronous and asynchronous activities in online and hybrid learning; in most cases, asynchronous activities provide the best experiences for students.  In our testing scenarios, attempts at synchronous activities using Zoom or Collaborate resulted in less-than-desired experiences, and were not comparable to using Zoom in a private meeting space.

We must recognize that mixing one group with synchronous digital technologies and one group with live synchronous meeting will increase both instructor and student difficulty (i.e., just turning on Zoom for the half of the class who isn’t physically in the classroom).

Consider whether your arrangements and the limitations of the technologies are equitable for all students.Particularly consider whether your activities are appropriate given the computer requirements for students in the university and in your department. Consider the student experience, including their access (or lack thereof) to sufficient broadband speeds.

 

 

 

 

 

Getting Started with Microsoft Teams for Education

Getting Started with Microsoft Teams for Education

A series of free, live, online training classes designed to get you up and running quickly

Microsoft is excited to host a series of free, live, online training classes designed to get you up and running with Teams. If you’re a faculty, admin, IT Pro, or student, you’ll find a class that’s right for you. Join us to see Teams in action, get your questions answered, and interact with our live instructors. For more training opportunities, including on-demand versions of live training, check out our on-demand end-user training.

Click a session below to sign up:

Say hello to Microsoft Teams: What is Microsoft Teams? Join us for this 30-minute orientation to discover what Teams is and how it can work for you.
Run effective meetings with Teams: Learn how you can leverage Teams for your pre, during, and post meetings experience.